Law Enforcement Reported Information Transfer 
	Circuit Court Clerk Information to Municipal Law Enforcement
	Number and Percent of Agencies Using MANUAL Information Transfer Methods	Number and Percent of Agencies Using ELECTRONIC Information Transfer Methods
	PHONE	FACSIMILE	HAND DELIVERY	US POSTAL SVC	DISKETTES	CD-ROMs	MAGNETIC TAPE	E-MAIL	DIRECT CONNECTION	WEB-BASED INTERFACE
	Total 
	Region	Respondents	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 
	     Collar	28	17	61	%	17	61	%	13	46	%	15	54	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	5	18	%	7	25	%	2	7	%
	     Cook	21	11	52	%	13	62	%	15	71	%	5	24	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	5	%	1	5	%	7	33	%	0	0	%
	     Rural	46	16	35	%	16	35	%	19	41	%	23	50	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	4	%	0	0	%
	     Urban	35	18	51	%	18	51	%	14	40	%	23	66	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	3	%	3	9	%	0	0	%
	STATE TOTAL	130	62	48	%	64	49	%	61	47	%	66	51	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	1	%	7	5	%	19	15	%	2	2	%
	Municipal Law Enforcement Information to Circuit Court Clerk's 
	Number and Percent of Agencies Using MANUAL Information Transfer Methods	Number and Percent of Agencies Using ELECTRONIC Information Transfer Methods
	PHONE	FACSIMILE	HAND DELIVERY	US POSTAL SVC	DISKETTES	CD-ROMs	MAGNETIC TAPE	E-MAIL	DIRECT CONNECTION	WEB-BASED INTERFACE
	Total 
	Region	Respondents	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 
	     Collar	28	18	64	%	17	61	%	24	86	%	14	50	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	4	%	2	7	%	0	0	%
	     Cook	21	9	43	%	12	57	%	17	81	%	5	24	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	10	%	2	10	%	2	10	%	1	5	%
	     Rural	46	21	46	%	15	33	%	37	80	%	23	50	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	4	%	0	0	%
	     Urban	35	19	54	%	15	43	%	30	86	%	18	51	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	3	%	2	6	%	2	6	%
	STATE TOTAL	130	67	52	%	59	45	%	108	83	%	60	46	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	2	%	4	3	%	8	6	%	3	2	%
	Municipal Law Enforcement Information to Jail / Shefiff's 
	Number and Percent of Agencies Using MANUAL Information Transfer Methods	Number and Percent of Agencies Using ELECTRONIC Information Transfer Methods
	PHONE	FACSIMILE	HAND DELIVERY	US POSTAL SVC	DISKETTES	CD-ROMs	MAGNETIC TAPE	E-MAIL	DIRECT CONNECTION	WEB-BASED INTERFACE
	Total 
	Region	Respondents	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 
	     Collar	28	16	57	%	17	61	%	24	86	%	7	25	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	4	%	1	4	%	1	4	%
	     Cook	21	9	43	%	10	48	%	13	62	%	5	24	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	5	%	0	0	%
	     Rural	46	30	65	%	27	59	%	42	91	%	18	39	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	3	7	%	1	2	%	0	0	%
	     Urban	35	20	57	%	19	54	%	29	83	%	8	23	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	3	%	3	9	%	1	3	%
	STATE TOTAL	130	75	58	%	73	56	%	108	83	%	38	29	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	5	4	%	6	5	%	2	2	%
	Law Enforcement Reported Information Transfer Methods
	Monday, May 05, 2003	Page 1 of 2

	Municipal Law Enforcement Information to State's Attorney's Office
	Number and Percent of Agencies Using MANUAL Information Transfer Methods	Number and Percent of Agencies Using ELECTRONIC Information Transfer Methods
	PHONE	FACSIMILE	HAND DELIVERY	US POSTAL SVC	DISKETTES	CD-ROMs	MAGNETIC TAPE	E-MAIL	DIRECT CONNECTION	WEB-BASED INTERFACE
	Total 
	Region	Respondents	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 
	     Collar	28	19	68	%	23	82	%	25	89	%	18	64	%	0	0	%	1	4	%	2	7	%	4	14	%	0	0	%	1	4	%
	     Cook	21	11	52	%	13	62	%	19	90	%	7	33	%	1	5	%	0	0	%	1	5	%	2	10	%	1	5	%	1	5	%
	     Rural	46	37	80	%	36	78	%	46	100	%	26	57	%	1	2	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	4	%	2	4	%	0	0	%
	     Urban	35	26	74	%	29	83	%	30	86	%	16	46	%	1	3	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	6	%	4	11	%	1	3	%
	STATE TOTAL	130	93	72	%	101	78	%	120	92	%	67	52	%	3	2	%	1	1	%	3	2	%	10	8	%	7	5	%	3	2	%
	Sheriff's Department Information to Municipal Law Enforcement
	Number and Percent of Agencies Using MANUAL Information Transfer Methods	Number and Percent of Agencies Using ELECTRONIC Information Transfer Methods
	PHONE	FACSIMILE	HAND DELIVERY	US POSTAL SVC	DISKETTES	CD-ROMs	MAGNETIC TAPE	E-MAIL	DIRECT CONNECTION	WEB-BASED INTERFACE
	Total 
	Region	Respondents	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 
	     Collar	28	14	50	%	13	46	%	11	39	%	11	39	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	4	%	3	11	%	0	0	%
	     Cook	21	7	33	%	11	52	%	8	38	%	6	29	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	5	%	1	5	%
	     Rural	46	27	59	%	28	61	%	30	65	%	23	50	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	2	%	6	13	%	0	0	%
	     Urban	35	26	74	%	27	77	%	20	57	%	20	57	%	1	3	%	0	0	%	1	3	%	2	6	%	7	20	%	1	3	%
	STATE TOTAL	130	74	57	%	79	61	%	69	53	%	60	46	%	1	1	%	0	0	%	1	1	%	4	3	%	17	13	%	2	2	%
	State's Attorney's Information to Municipal Law Enforcement
	Number and Percent of Agencies Using MANUAL Information Transfer Methods	Number and Percent of Agencies Using ELECTRONIC Information Transfer Methods
	PHONE	FACSIMILE	HAND DELIVERY	US POSTAL SVC	DISKETTES	CD-ROMs	MAGNETIC TAPE	E-MAIL	DIRECT CONNECTION	WEB-BASED INTERFACE
	Total 
	Region	Respondents	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 	Agencies	Percent 
	     Collar	28	17	61	%	18	64	%	14	50	%	19	68	%	1	4	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	4	%	0	0	%	0	0	%
	     Cook	21	12	57	%	11	52	%	7	33	%	6	29	%	1	5	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	1	5	%	2	10	%	0	0	%
	     Rural	46	30	65	%	22	48	%	28	61	%	26	57	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	4	%	0	0	%
	     Urban	35	26	74	%	23	66	%	15	43	%	21	60	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	2	6	%	4	11	%	1	3	%
	STATE TOTAL	130	85	65	%	74	57	%	64	49	%	72	55	%	2	2	%	0	0	%	0	0	%	4	3	%	8	6	%	1	1	%
	Law Enforcement Reported Information Transfer Methods
	Monday, May 05, 2003	Page 2 of 2