Aggregated Information Transfer Methods: 
	Probation Departments
	Circuit Court Clerk to Probation Department
	Total # of 	MANUAL Information Transfer	ELECTRONIC Information Transfer
	Region	Respondents
	Agencies	Percent	Agencies	Percent
	     Collar	3	3	100%	3	100%
	     Cook	1	1	100%	0	0%
	     Rural	8	8	100%	5	63%
	     Urban	16	15	94%	7	44%
	STATE TOTAL	28	27	96%	15	54%
	Jail / Sheriff's Department to Probaton Department
	Total # of 	MANUAL Information Transfer	ELECTRONIC Information Transfer
	Region	Respondents
	Agencies	Percent	Agencies	Percent
	     Collar	3	3	100%	2	67%
	     Cook	1	1	100%	0	0%
	     Rural	8	6	75%	0	0%
	     Urban	16	13	81%	3	19%
	STATE TOTAL	28	23	82%	5	18%
	Probation Department to Circuit Court Clerk's Office
	Total # of 	MANUAL Information Transfer	ELECTRONIC Information Transfer
	Region	Respondents
	Agencies	Percent	Agencies	Percent
	     Collar	3	3	100%	2	67%
	     Cook	1	1	100%	0	0%
	     Rural	8	8	100%	1	13%
	     Urban	16	15	94%	2	13%
	STATE TOTAL	28	27	96%	5	18%
	Aggregated Information Transfer Methods: Probation Departments
	Monday, May 05, 2003	Page 1 of 2

	Probation Department to State's Attorney's Office
	Total # of 	MANUAL Information Transfer	ELECTRONIC Information Transfer
	Region	Respondents
	Agencies	Percent	Agencies	Percent
	     Collar	3	3	100%	2	67%
	     Cook	1	1	100%	0	0%
	     Rural	8	8	100%	0	0%
	     Urban	16	16	100%	4	25%
	STATE TOTAL	28	28	100%	6	21%
	State's Attorney's Office to Probation Department
	Total # of 	MANUAL Information Transfer	ELECTRONIC Information Transfer
	Region	Respondents
	Agencies	Percent	Agencies	Percent
	     Collar	3	3	100%	2	67%
	     Cook	1	1	100%	0	0%
	     Rural	8	8	100%	0	0%
	     Urban	16	15	94%	4	25%
	STATE TOTAL	28	27	96%	6	21%
	Aggregated Information Transfer Methods: Probation Departments
	Monday, May 05, 2003	Page 2 of 2